Additional comments and refinements
This commit is contained in:
@@ -294,7 +294,31 @@
|
||||
"id": "9468860b-86a2-41df-af01-b2400cc985be",
|
||||
"metadata": {},
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"## Time to use LangChain to bring it all together"
|
||||
"# Time to use LangChain to bring it all together"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"cell_type": "markdown",
|
||||
"id": "8ba8a5e7-965d-4770-a12d-532aff50c4b5",
|
||||
"metadata": {},
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"<table style=\"margin: 0; text-align: left;\">\n",
|
||||
" <tr>\n",
|
||||
" <td style=\"width: 150px; height: 150px; vertical-align: middle;\">\n",
|
||||
" <img src=\"../important.jpg\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" style=\"display: block;\" />\n",
|
||||
" </td>\n",
|
||||
" <td>\n",
|
||||
" <h2 style=\"color:#900;\">PLEASE READ ME! Ignoring the Deprecation Warning</h2>\n",
|
||||
" <span style=\"color:#900;\">When you run the next cell, you will get a LangChainDeprecationWarning \n",
|
||||
" about the simple way we use LangChain memory. They ask us to migrate to their new approach for memory. \n",
|
||||
" I feel quite conflicted about this. The new approach involves moving to LangGraph and getting deep into their ecosystem.\n",
|
||||
" There's a fair amount of learning and coding in LangGraph, frankly without much benefit in our case.<br/><br/>\n",
|
||||
" I'm going to think about whether/how to incorporate it in the course, but for now please ignore the Depreciation Warning and\n",
|
||||
" use the code as is; LangChain are not expected to remove ConversationBufferMemory any time soon.\n",
|
||||
" </span>\n",
|
||||
" </td>\n",
|
||||
" </tr>\n",
|
||||
"</table>"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user